lambda_vs_sagemaker_llm 10 Q&As

Lambda Vs Sagemaker LLM FAQ & Answers

10 expert Lambda Vs Sagemaker LLM answers researched from official documentation. Every answer cites authoritative sources you can verify.

unknown

10 questions
A

Lambda: general compute, 15min max timeout, 10GB memory limit, ephemeral storage, $0.0000166667/GB-sec. SageMaker Serverless: ML-optimized, no timeout, 6GB memory max per inference, persistent model loading, $0.000133/sec + $0.0002/inference. Lambda for: small models (<1GB), API gateways. SageMaker for: large models (>1GB), batch processing.

99% confidence
A

Fully managed inference without provisioning instances (2024-2025). Auto-scales 0→N based on traffic, charges per inference + idle time. Memory: 1GB-6GB, model size: <10GB compressed. Cold start: 10-60s (loads model into memory). Best for: sporadic traffic, cost optimization vs real-time endpoints. Not for: <200ms latency SLA.

99% confidence
A

Use Lambda when: (1) Model <1GB (DistilBERT, small fine-tunes), (2) Inference <15min, (3) Simple API (no complex pre/post processing), (4) Low request volume (<100/min), (5) Cold start <10s acceptable. Example: sentiment analysis with DistilBERT (250MB), text classification with small BERT variants.

99% confidence
A

Lambda: 5-10s for <500MB models (download from S3 + load). SageMaker Serverless: 20-60s for models >1GB (pull Docker image + load model). Optimization: Lambda Provisioned Concurrency (eliminates cold start, $0.0000041667/GB-sec), SageMaker provisioned instances (not serverless). Both cache models between invocations within 15min (Lambda) / 15min (SageMaker).

99% confidence
A

Use Lambda container images (10GB limit): (1) Create Dockerfile with model + dependencies, (2) Push to ECR, (3) Create Lambda function from ECR image. Example: FROM public.ecr.aws/lambda/python:3.12, COPY model/ /opt/ml/model/, CMD ["app.handler"]. Benefits: bypass 250MB deployment package limit, use custom runtimes. Cold start: 10-30s for large images.

99% confidence
A

Lambda can mount EFS for large models (>10GB). Benefits: share model across functions, bypass storage limits. Drawbacks: cold start +2-5s (EFS mount), throughput limits (100MB/s baseline), cost ($0.30/GB-month). Use case: multiple Lambda functions sharing 20GB+ model. Alternative: S3 mount via FUSE (s3fs), but slower.

99% confidence
A

Monitor: (1) Cold start frequency (CloudWatch metric: ColdStartDuration), (2) Inference latency (custom metric in logs), (3) Memory usage (Lambda: MaxMemoryUsed, SageMaker: ModelLatency), (4) Error rates (invocation errors, model errors), (5) Cost (AWS Cost Explorer filtered by service). Alert on: >5s P99 latency, >1% error rate, cost spike >$50/day.

99% confidence